Privacy or Protection

Ever since the Paris and San Bernardino incidents, the age-old question has arisen again: privacy or protection?

The NSA has again renewed its battle against encryption and has, yet again, asked tech companies to create backdoors for law enforcement to track and observe possible terrorist agents. Due to recent terrorist activities, presidentiables Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have backed FBI Director James Comey’s insistence on creating back doors. Comey defends the idea and says these back doors are needed so tech companies can comply with judicial orders, and not as a way for the FBI to stockpile keys to people’s houses. Instead of encryption being available only to the sophisticated bad guys, it’s now available by default, he added.

The NSA’s battle with encryption has increased post-Snowden. The whistleblower caused an increase in privacy-upholding technologies and increased people’s awareness of violations of their privacy. NSA surveillance claimed to have been used for counter-terrorism, has been hit pretty hard ever since.

Although the NSA and other supporters of surveillance continually use the Paris and San Bernardino incidents as proof that mass surveillance is needed again, tech experts deem this to be a premature move. There was no evidence that the terrorists responsible for these attacks used encryption. In fact, a cellphone owned by the terrorist responsible for the Paris incident was found and showed that he didn’t use encryption in his messages. There were also no evidence that the married couple responsible for the San Bernardino incident communicated digitally.

Tech experts argue that creating back doors would create more harm than good. A back door that allows law enforcers to read or track people would also mean that there’s a door that hackers can come into — an easier one to break, at that.

As Paul Kocher, a cryptographer and president and chief scientist of the Rambus Cryptography Research Division, said, “We have far more to lose by having our information attacked than gained from weakening everyone’s information security.”

However, the decision still rests with each of us, whether we choose privacy or protection.

We at SearchLock believe that privacy IS protection and we want to protect YOUR privacy.

Learn how we protect it here.

 

3 thoughts on “Internet Privacy or Protection?

  • March 11, 2016 at 11:56 pm
    Permalink

    Dont give this crooked gov’t anything. We the people (80% ignorant to what is going on) do not need anymore infringement. they watch us on our camera’s laptop which is now covered with tape. Hillary esp needs to be tracked so you people may need to come up with something that will track all politicos, the congress,pentagon, presidency etc…. I hope you people are doing a positive thing……………thanks.

    Reply
  • May 13, 2016 at 9:49 pm
    Permalink

    This is a good thing that chrome does and i like it, keep doing good things for customers.

    Reply
  • July 30, 2016 at 7:34 pm
    Permalink

    It is all a little overwhelming sometimes. To stay on top of this steadily advancing technology would require a lot of time. Gone are the early days of internet. when there was kind of an honor system as people slowly adapted to this new technology. As the vulnerabilities became apparent some used the weaknesses inherent in the system to exploit others . While i’m sure our gov. intentions were good initially. Allowing them free access to any and all data is simply too much power in the hands of anyone. People that are not I.T. specialists and use the internet as an aid should not have to feel threatened or intimidated because of prying eye’s. I commend SeachLock in its efforts to protect privacy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *